D365O. X++ objects equality.


There are two different kinds of equality: equality by reference and equality by value. I’m not going to explain these basic concepts here, because you can find tons of information in the web, today I want to show how you can implement value based comparison in X++.

By default AX uses reference check. In previous versions we could override equal method of the Object class to implement value based comparison, however, we have to explicitly derive new class from Object, because it was not derived by default and equal was not called by AX (as far as I know). For example, if you wanted to use value equality with collections, like set, you had to workaround using map where key is combination of fields and value is object itself.

With new version of AX we moved to .NET world where X++ is almost a first class citizen. Why almost?  There are bunch of limitations and not implemented features like generics, but we slowly getting there.

Let’s get back to value equality. Now, each class is derived from System.Object. System.Object has Equals and GetHashCode methods used to check equality that we can override. Again, there are lots of info in the web about these two methods and guidelines how to override them, so I’ll jump straight into the example.

I have a new class with two public fields:

class MyClass
    public int a;
    public int b;

In my test job, I want to store instances of MyClass in a set. Set should contain only instances with unique combination of a and b values.

public static void main(Args _args)
    MyClass myClass1 = new MyClass();
    myClass1.a = 5;
    myClass1.b = 10;

    MyClass myClass2 = new MyClass();
    myClass2.a = 5;
    myClass2.b = 10;

    Set set = new Set(Types::Class);



As we already know, AX will add 2 elements into the set because it always performs reference check by default.

Let’s override Equals and GetHashCode using MSDN guidelines

public int GetHashCode()
    return this.a ^ this.b;

public boolean Equals(System.Object _obj)
    if (_obj == null)
        return false;

    if (System.Object::ReferenceEquals(this, _obj))
        return true;

    if (!this.GetType().Equals(_obj.GetType()))
        return false;

    MyClass compareTo = _obj;

    if (compareTo.a == this.a && compareTo.b == this.b)
        return true;
        return false;

It’s just an example how “standard” features from .NET could be used in X++. Moving forward, you can expand this example implementing IComparable interface, so new class could be added to any standard .NET collection and be sorted! But it’s a topic for another blog.

4 thoughts on “D365O. X++ objects equality.

    • Ievgen Miroshnikov May 15, 2017 / 6:19 am

      Thank Martin,
      Good comment and awesome article from Eric that shows how much we need to learn as X++ developers in new .Net world.

  1. Oleksandr Katrusha May 30, 2017 / 10:43 am

    Would this gethashcode() be unique enough to avoid collisions – the main risk when working with hashes?

    • Ievgen Miroshnikov May 30, 2017 / 9:56 pm

      Hi Oleksandr,
      You will find the answer in the article provided by Martin in previous comment, it covers your questions and all other questions you may have, so I won’t event try to explain it myself 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s